In my last post about Korean society, I noted that as a result of Confucianism, Koreans are a very loyal people. This extreme loyalty is one that is really quite evident in the relationship between South Korea and North Korea.
Loyalty, as a result of Confucianism, has so deeply been rooted into Korean culture that even going to Hanil Super for that extra milk that is so desperately needed in the morning is symbolic of this trait. Getting milk at Family Mart could be a sign of disloyalty. While searching future employment, looking at different jobs simultaneously is considered disloyal. With such a deep tendency toward loyalty, it is no wonder that many Korean people (especially younger generations) are empathetic toward their brothers and sisters to the North. Even when children in my classes were given an assignment to create a new country flag, several made flags consisting of North and South Korean Flag symbols - in hope for unity. To make things clear, the people are in no way in favor of nuclear proliferation. They are rather solely in favor of unity of the Korean people.
It is important to remember that South Korea only very recently established its democracy just a little over 50 years ago. This is the same time of the North-South split. As a result, thousands of years of a united people has just recently divided.
From what I have observed, many younger Koreans feel empathy for North Korea. Unlike the West, fear is not a strong emotion when it comes to the possibility of North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. One individual that I had spoken with stated that because the South was in such close proximity, there was no reason to fear. More of a concern is whether stocks would continue to plummet as a result of nuclear tests. If the South were to be attacked, the North would pay just as much as the South would.
I watched a segment where random, ordinary people were interviewed about the reigning political situation. A taxi driver and his customer were asked what they thought. They both replied that the international community ought to give NK some slack or leeway - because they are essentially the same people.
While the younger generations have compassion for NK, older generations keep memories of the Korean War. As a result, many lack the same compassion as their younger counterparts.
The population varies in thought. I believe that in the last election, the younger pro-compassion voters just missed electing a president that empathizes with NK. Currently, the Korean government has taken a single stance on the issue. It is my conjecture that as a result of pressure from the international community, SK has been a leader against the nuclear ambitions of NK.
The South has not only been a leader, but also a participant in one of the strangest and most peculiar military standoffs ever.
This leads to a topic for the next post – the 50 year standoff between North Korea and South Korea.